HIV activists must fight their corner in the global scrum to prioritise development issues post 2015. Marielle Hart offers valuable insights on what's worth fighting for.
With the mega-issues of poverty, hunger, health, education and global warming challenging the global community, HIV activists often struggle to be heard. But 2015, is not the year to take a back seat.
Marielle Hart, policy manager for the International HIV/AIDS Alliance and STOP AIDS NOW! is campaigning hard to ensure HIV is not buried under the mountain of competing priorities when a new global development agenda is finalised by the UN this September.
So why is 2015 such a big deal for HIV activists?
At the UN General Assembly, 193 member states of the United Nations will come together to agree a final version of the 17 new goals and 164 targets currently proposed as the world’s new sustainable development goals (SDGs).
The new goals will take us up to 2030 and replace the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that were established in 2000, which end this year.
The MDGs included a specific goal on AIDS and since then massive progress has been made in tackling the epidemic – new data shows that 2013 was the first year when more people started getting treatment than became infected with HIV, an exciting tipping point in the journey to ending AIDS! So while the HIV community acknowledges that securing a standalone goal for AIDS is no longer realistic with so many other competing priorities, there is also an urgent need to ensure HIV doesn’t slip from the agenda or many of the gains made will be at risk.
Over the last couple of years we’ve been advocating with other civil society groups and UNAIDS to get UN Member States to adopt strong targets around HIV and its many cross-cutting issues. It’s been a huge challenge with so many diverse governments around the table, as lots of language around HIV in particular in relation to human rights, key populations and sexual and reproductive health and rights is particularly contentious. We had some wins, but also a number of losses in the proposal on post-2015 goals and targets which a group of UN Member States was tasked to submit to the UN Secretary General in June 2014.
The sustainable development goals will be finalised and adopted in September 2015. Time is now running out to influence the last intergovernmental negotiations between UN member states. Our work is cut out for us to make the targets stronger and work better for the issues we care about.
What are the HIV ‘wins’ in the proposed sustainable development goals?
We have come a long way since we started engaging in this post-2015 process two years ago when it was far from being sure whether AIDS would be included at all. Although HIV no longer has a standalone goal, there is a target to end AIDS by 2030 under the proposed health goal: ‘ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages’. It will be crucial to keep protecting this target as member states enter into their negotiations, particularly as some felt it was too ambitious.
Other wins that we need to protect include:
- Sexual and reproductive health as a target under both the health goal and gender goal
- A stand-alone goal on equality and a target promoting social inclusion of all
- References to the rule of law, anti-discriminatory laws, and human rights
And what still needs fighting for?
One of the key factors in tackling HIV is the fact that marginalised groups – such as men who have sex with men, transgender people, sex workers and drug users – are so much more vulnerable to the disease. In many countries they are criminalised and their human rights are abused, making it extremely difficult to provide HIV prevention and treatment services.
Although universal health coverage (UHC) is a target under the overarching health goal, to ensure true equitable access, we strongly pushed at every opportunity to include a specific reference to marginalised and vulnerable groups as part of this target. To our great disappointment, while this language had been part of the UHC target in earlier proposals, it was ultimately taken out, as it proved too contentious. This will be one of the biggest challenges for us to get it back in again by September.
Another contentious issue was the inclusion of a target on sexual and reproductive rights. As a result of strong advocacy by civil society, a sexual and reproductive health target was included under both the health and gender goals. However, there is no reference to sexual rights– we need to get this reinstated.
Other key issues currently missing are a reference to comprehensive sexuality education under the education goal; specific mentioning of HIV-related stigma, discrimination and human rights violations, despite these being among the biggest obstacles to ending the AIDS epidemic; references to intellectual property with regards to bringing down the price of medication; and sufficient attention to the specific needs and priorities of young people, especially young marginalised people.
What are the next steps?
Well it’s still all to play for! Here is a list of key dates where we need to make sure the voices of those most affected by HIV are being heard, by getting them round the table and getting their stories in the media.
- Jan – August: intergovernmental post-2015 negotiations
- 30 – 31 January: African Union Summit, Addis Ababa
- 9-10 February: UNGA High Level Debate on Means of Implementation for post-2015
- March: UNGA High Level Debate on Gender Equality
- 9-20 March: Commission on Status of Women
- 13-17 April: Conference on Population Development
- April/May: Informal hearings with civil society
- May: EU Council Conclusions on means of implementation
- 8-22 May: World Health Assembly, Geneva
- 26 June – 8 July: Third High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development
- 13-16 July: Financing for Development Conference, Addis Ababa
- 25-27 September: UN Post-2015 Summit
Read more stories about the post 2015 development agenda
Find out why addressing inequality is the major health challenge of our time
COMMENTS
Great story Sa!
Thanks Owen 😉 Hoping it will stimulate some strong post 2015 stories this year. I know there’s lots of HIV activists out there with strong opinions!
superb….. well written story
Ahh, thanks Hazvie, much appreciated 😉
Compelling story!!! Thank you so much Sarah
So easy to read and very compelling story. Very helpful
Great story S. I notice there is not much focus on health in the SDGs. But do you think we can have any impact on this SDGs draft or do I say working document? Since it is already out
Thanks all for your comments!
Chibuike - ‘ensuring healthy lives’ is goal 3 out of 17 goals, so it has a prominent position and definitely I think there’s still room to influence the final negotiations and also as governments start to work out their indicators for how they will measure progress made towards the goals - so if you have strong opinions about these issues make sure you get them known before September!
Okay. I will sure do!
Dear Sarah
Woah! very timely. Thank you for this very thoughtful reference… I’m glad HIV still strives to sift through the SDGs and hope that out of our engagement HIV shall not just be considered a health issue but also an issue that cut across social, economic and environment spectrum.
I have problem with proposed Goal number 5 which marginalizes men. I thought in the advent of gender and development, violence of all forms to all persons should be tackled and tailored to specific vulnerabilities of both men and women. Gender empowerment should empower all gender including various gender and sexual identities and not just based on sex which. Rule of law and equality of all in the eyes of the law using the Universal Declaration of Human rights as the instrument.
Sexuality education too I agree should be highlighted to address sexuality related stigma.
The word “for all” sounds inclusive but there should be reference of those who most marginalized and impoverished as targets for sustainable development. most marginalized and most affected of poverty, ill-health, illiteracy, climate change, conflicts and disasters should be prioritized as targets and they are only found in Goal 4.
For goal number 17, “planning” is also missing ahead of “implementation” particularly the bottom up approach that help in development of programs for sustainable development informed by solutions from the grassroots up using the theories such as those of Paolo Freire and others. Also, instead of using “stake holders” should also be change to “power holders” to highlight the role and relationships of duty bearers (governments) and claim holders (citizens, communities, most vulnerable) as both power holders for sustainable development.
Thank you and more power to all of us
Hi John Pierre!
Thanks for your comments, you’ve got lots of really interesting opinions! It would be great to see you write an article on these issues 😉
Cheers
S